Jump to content

Crew Experience Extended incorrect


Recommended Posts

Crew Exp extended does not show the correct information.  As you can see in the screenshot, the experience needed to reach the next skill level is not the same as the actual amount needed.  Aslain, I know that this is not your mod, but Spoter has stated in his WoT forum post for this mod that he will no longer be supporting it via the forum.  Do you have a way for me to contact him outside of the WoT forum to let him know of this problem?

post-3627-0-46539300-1442764549_thumb.jp

Link to comment
  • Moderator

Scratch that, you can change it yourself.

 

By default it's using this macro: {exp-step} (amount of experience to the next level of skill is studied)

 

The one you need to use is this macro: {training-progress} (the current level being studied at the moment skills)

 

So under this section: "hangar_crew": {

Find this line: "rank_string": "[{exp-step-battles}|{exp-step}] {rank}",
And change it to: "rank_string": "[{exp-step-battles}|{training-progress}] {rank}",
Link to comment

That changes the exp needed to the next step to the actual skill level.  So, instead of showing 11/4.4k  it shows 11/99 where 99 is the skill level (99%) of that crew member.  I changed the line in both my language as well as all languages. Once just in my language, then in all languages...same result.  Thanks for your help...it is not really a big deal though. 

post-3627-0-60750000-1442766506_thumb.jp

Link to comment
  • Moderator

Derp.... my bad. Looked at the wrong thing, haha.

 

{exp-step} is the current one :P

 

And it was this line that needed fixing:

"role_string": "[<font color=\"#00FF00\">{training-battles}</font><img align=\"top\" src=\"img://gui/maps//icons/library/BattleResultIcon-1.png\" height=\"14\" width=\"14\" vspace=\"-3\"/><font color=\"#FFFF00\">{exp-step}</font><img align=\"top\" src=\"img://gui/maps//icons/library/XpIcon-1.png\" height=\"16\" width=\"16\" vspace=\"-3\"/>]{role}",
Link to comment

Oh well, that shows the same as it does with the original configuration.  The amount to go from 99%-100% is 9.6k.  My crew member needs 3.8k to reach 100%.  That is the info that I think would be most useful. 

 

Even on another crew member who needs 114,968 xp to reach 100%, the mod shows 143k needed to reach 100%.  So even the original configuration is not correct.

 

Edit:  The estimated battles needed is correct, it is just that the xp needed is incorrect.

Edited by bkc1965
Link to comment
  • Moderator

:angry:  :(  :wacko:  :blink:  < That's about the emotions I'm going through, lol....... (and sorry if I'm wasting your time..  :mellow:)

 

Well, here's a google translate of the macro list... I'm out of suggestions, and too pissed off to try anymore  :P

 

// {skillicons}: (only in "barracks_crew") icons skills
// {training-level}: the current level of skill without bonuses
// {basic-training-level}: the current level of skill bonuses
// {firstname}: Name
// {lastname}: Surname
// {rank}: Title
// {exp-total}: ​​the total amount of experience to the next skill (rounded)
// {training-battles}: the number of fights to the next skill, taking into account the prem status (rounded)
// {nxtskillvlv}: The next available level of skills
// {skillsCnt}: the current number of skills
// {training-progress}: the current level being studied at this time skills
// {role}: Position
// {curexp}: dialed experience
// {vehicleType}: class of technology
// {exp-step}: amount of experience to the next level of skill is studied
// {exp-step-battles}: the number of fights to the next skill level, taking into account the prem status (rounded)
// {exp-free}: free, not the distribution of experience
// {lastSkillLevel}: the current level of skills
Link to comment

You are definitely not wasting my time.  This has been a learning experience and I like to learn.  I have changed the exp-total to exp-step in all three languages and ended up with the crew member that had 99% skill level showing the correct information but the ones that have something less than 99% showing incorrect.  So, I created a problem by solving a problem.  So, I am giving up on this now.  Thanks for your help.

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.