Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 03/19/18 in all areas

  1. Yeah - I know that - but you don't see the problem in YOUR mod causing camouflage to be bought, WITHOUT USER ACTIONS, because the one set is already in battle? You should code in a prevention of that... don't just keep saying "It's not my mod" - when - clearly - it is your mod causing that behavior. Without your mod - it takes TWO clicks to buy camo. With your mod - it takes ZERO clicks to suddenly buy camo. "Blah blah client buys it" - only because your mod FORCES the client to do so
    1 point
  2. LOL... probably because lal the Russians that use it already has plenty of camo And I saw that video he made - totally avoiding the actual issue... 12 minutes of pointless video
    1 point
  3. Developers can be rather touchy -- and Shura did respond with (all caps) " Mod does NOT BUY ANYTHING!" The statement is strictly correct -- it is the WOT client making the purchase. However, I place this into the category of misaligned semantics -- its rather like someone taking my hand, using my finger to enter my debit card pin, then extracting money from my bank account. Strictly speaking, it WAS my finger that touched the buttons --- but ignores the fact that my hand was being manipulated, not by my person, but by outside influences. the WOT client is simply doing what it is being told to do. I do have some issues, however, Shura indicated that if the warehouse didnt have the camo, then the client would go ahead and buy more camo. But I know when I go into the client I can see quite a bit of free gold camo (I had put camo on my prem tanks) that appears to be available. yet, Auxilium still would make a purchase. So I have some questions about the algorithm being used -- but like I said, developers are touchy when questions come from those whom the developer assumes have no idea what it is like to code.
    1 point
  4. It's a bit weird that Shura seems to put blame on WG, and not realize that his mod - is bypassing - not one - but TWO user clicks.. When you go to buy camo normally, you need to do these steps: Mount camo. Click "Purchase" Click "Purchase and Exit" And THEN you get the camo. So Shura saying it's not his mod buying the camo - seems a bit fishy?
    1 point
  5. I've confirmed with Shura that the WOT client (at the direction of Auxilium) WILL spend your gold on camo if you applied gold camo and try to use the same gold camo among several tanks. To be clear, and what Shura has said, Auxilium really doesnt "spend your gold" --- Auxilium only tells the client to mount "camouflage Nexx" and if that is not available the client (not Auxilium) will automatically spend gold for a new set of camo's. Thus, Auxilium has absolutely no way of knowing a priori if gold is going to be spent or not. I get the behavior and the defense of this functionality -- but to an and user it is a matter of Semantics: Either I manually approve the spending of Gold (which takes conscious thought and intent) or a program (Auxilium) makes the "decision" for me based upon the misunderstanding of how the mod actually works. In practice the only fix that we as users can effect is to ONLY use Auxilium to share the free camo that came with the latest update. Use gold camo only if you are aware of the consequences.
    1 point
  6. I can confirm that Auxilium **IS NOT** performing as we expect. I just had this happen -- plenty of "gold camo" sitting there, I switched tanks in the carousel, NO tanks in battle and the mod purchased new gold camo for all three seasons. And, gold locker was enabled. This mod can end up being VERY expensive for anyone who keeps some gold hanging around. I have posted this on the Auxilium NA forum. Aslain, I would highly recommend disabling the inclusion of the AutoCamo piece of the mod until such a time as this feature is fixed.
    0 points
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.